[mmq]

One additional feature that I would like to see: interacting with 2 or more GPTs at the same time where they could perform different tasks based on their specific expertise and capabilities either in parallel or even sequentially as long as the replies/context of the discussion is accessible for further interactions, similar to what can be achieved with the assistants API.

[sudb]

This sounds similar to Microsoft's Autogen, and I think it's possible to replicate a lot of what you're talking about by using the rough structure of Autogen alongside the Assistants API

[mmq]

I know that the use-case that I mentioned as well as many of the agentive aspects can be achieved using code. But I have to admit that using the UI and easily create GPTs, whether using them just as templates/personas or full-featured with actions/plugins, makes the use-case much easier, faster, and sharable. I can just @ at specific GPT to do something. Take the use-case that Simon mentions in his blog post, Dejargonizer, I can have a research GPT that helps with reviewin papers and I can @Dejargonizer to quickly explain a specific term, before resuming the discussion with the research GPT.

Maybe this would require additional research, but I think having a single GPT with access to all tools might be slower and less optimal, especially if the user knows exactly what they need for a given task and can reach for that quickly.