| > I think you're imagining the ID thief going to the bank and withdrawing your money from your bank account (which probably happens too). No, I'm imagining a scenario where the things used to identify me to service providers is taken by someone. > I also think your analogy of a "friend" isn't right... I didn't mention a friend. > you are the bank's PAYING customer... you pay them to secure your money and only give it to you! I agree, but as per my analogy, the car's owner has had their car stolen. > If they fail to provide the service they're offering to you... seems like they ought to be responsible for their failure. As per my analogy, I'm not saying that the car shouldn't have been secured, nor that the storage provider shouldn't make the situation right via insurance etc. Only that the car owner is the one who is a victim of car theft. > You aren't really involved... the bank messed up by going "Oh you say you're Bob? Okay here you go!" Why is it your fault that they failed to accurately verify the identity of the person they gave THEIR money to? You didn't play any role in them deciding who to give their money, nor in their ID verification procedures. The bank being at fault doesn't mean the victim's identity wasn't stolen. All of these objections seem to assume that if someone has something stolen, it was their fault. That's not true, and that assertion is what I'm objecting to. |