|
|
|
|
|
by TacticalCoder
955 days ago
|
|
GP was defending EA even though TFA clearly explains how stolen money by SBF was used to buy a $16 mansion in the UK by the EA movement, all the while knowing SBF was living a lavish lifestyle but presenting him as an altruistic genius. In other words: GP's comment defends EA without taking into account the facts shown in TFA. |
|
Article is BS, that money wasn't stolen. The decision making behind the purchase was transparant. Furthering the cause of EA itself was a goal of the specific fund from which they drew that money [1]. It gives them a place to have big nice conferences, which drives donations which will well exceed $16M.
Anyway, I didn't donate to that fund. I donated to the Global Dev fund [2]. If you donated to fund [1], then you knew your money would be spent on stuff like conferences.
[1] https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/ea-community
[2] https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/global-development