|
|
|
|
|
by Locke1689
5177 days ago
|
|
That's the worst ranking that I can possibly think of. It doesn't even use Google Scholar, which may introduce an interesting metric, like cited papers from universities. Also, how do people not know this already? The results number in Google is wrong. It's just an inaccurate estimate designed to give people the "wow" factor when you search in Google. |
|
For example, take a look this publication based ranking: http://www.urch.com/forums/computer-science-admissions/79645...