|
|
|
|
|
|
by komali2
957 days ago
|
|
|
> There is a legitimate use case for artists but that isn't what is driving the new mania. > This time there are massive technical gotchas (you have a link to a .jpg hosted on a server or servers, you don't own the copyright to anything). It sounds like you've reconciled this, I'm curious how? |
|
|
I'm stating in the first quote that there is an idea of artists selling their work, but that isn't what is driving the accelerated adoption.
In the second quote I point out some of the technical deficiencies, it is supposed to contrast the first. It doesn't reconcile.
The comment chain is on the topic of why these technical deficiencies are news to so many people, my opinion is that we skipped the scrutiny that BTC experienced and we experienced a gold rush.