|
|
|
|
|
by dontlaugh
958 days ago
|
|
It would require that Wayland be aware of internals of the "compositor". Instead of that, Wayland is only aware of surfaces, which it can guarantee can be stitched together within a certain time budget. Hence none of the tearing that is unavoidable with X11. A window close event goes to the "compositor" of a surface, without being aware of which PID may have caused what is currently rendered on that surface. Windows and macOS do the same, if only because they have a single "compositor"/window manager. |
|