|
|
|
|
|
by dale_glass
958 days ago
|
|
Then you're using it wrong. GPG isn't adding anything to this that SHA256 wouldn't, and you're just relying on the SSL certificate. Look at your list of CAs sometime. There's multiple national organizations there. Controlled by a government. And any of those will be deemed as valid, so if you go to https://www.torproject.org/download/ and it's signed by a Chinese CA for some reason, to your browser that's perfectly fine. > What are the chances the official site AND the archive were both compromised? You're talking about a piece of software that's designed to hide stuff from state level actors. If you're in actual need of such a thing, that threat is pretty damn serious. |
|
In a way, having JavaScript client-side verification of files as an option would be as secure (if not more secure) in most circumstances because it'd be more noob friendly. At the very least to ensure mirrors aren't doing anything nefarious.