|
|
|
|
|
by tivert
958 days ago
|
|
I don't think the court would be satisfied by those, because they're both abstract hypotheticals. I think they want a specific person harmed in an explicit, documented way (e.g. Bob Smith has erectile dysfunction and had his reputation damaged because he was bombarded with ED ads in his car during a date, because the car manufacturer read his texts and used them to make an ad profile). |
|