| > yes, but there's always some trail this way... travel logs, mailing logs, someone there to set it up, etc All meaningless if you don't fly and use only cash, and a fake ID > again, just easier to shoot someone... we don't need to make up imaginary drone violence, there's not much reason for it outside of a warzone I didn't think it was easier than shooting someone. All of this stems from me saying it's only a matter of time until a psycho mounts a gun onto a drone and flies it over a crowd. We have a mass shooting once a week. Tech is easier and more accessible and only continues to be easier and more available. If soldiers are taking off the shelf drones and using them to easily kill people on the cheap, it's only a matter of time until instead of a box of ammo and trench coat, someone throws on a dji vr headset and flies a drone with either a gun on it or a bomb. It's not imaginary > Just a few months ago, a head of state was attacked with off-the-shelf consumer drones — an apparent first. It happened in broad daylight on August 4 in Venezuela. According to police, the drones exploded and missed their target https://www.defenseone.com/feature/against-the-drones/ > Armed men allegedly identified as members of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) attacked the community of Pinolapa, in the municipality of Tepalcatepec, in the state of Michoacán, with drones loaded with explosives. > residents of the area indicated that the drones were loaded with C4 explosives and fragmentation grenades https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/mexican-cartel-tactica... https://www.politico.eu/article/future-warfare-400-army-stri... It's illogical to think it won't happen at some point |