|
|
|
|
|
by xtian
960 days ago
|
|
Burden of proof would fall upon the person making the claim. Appealing to the cultivated state of general ignorance in the West does not absolve you of this. In fact, the article you reference supports my position since it cites “restrictive laws and regulations” as the reason these companies do not operate in China. |
|
2. It’s already a well known and accepted phenomenon
The burden of proof is still on you since you’re making a claim that goes against accepted facts, while NOT providing anything concrete to back it up.
We’re not getting anywhere. there is no point in continuing this conversation