[gngoo]

To paint an accurate picture, an hard pass on crypto would mean:

- wanted to bank the poor, with crypto.

- wanted freedom, with crypto.

- wanted self sovereign identity, with crypto.

- wanted border-less transfers for their family abroad, with crypto.

They could have chosen any of those areas without, but they chose to do it with crypto. There is a clear choice for them to do that, as well a very reasonable option for an employer to choose an employee "who wanted freedom, with XXX" over an employee who "wanted freedom, with ZZZ (crypto)". This does not equate to racism (neither is it unethical imo), regardless whether the employer chose to exclude based on perceived morality of their crypto choice.