[someplaceguy]

Well, that's it, isn't it?

Even if AI can do everything, you'd still want the authentic human experience.

99% of people are far smarter than horses but people still pay to ride horses.

I don't see why someone wouldn't want to pay to... ride me... uh, in a matter of speaking, of course (of course). I mean, look at me.

[TerrifiedMouse]

> 99% of people are far smarter than horses but people still pay to ride horses.

How many working horses are there today vs before automobiles?

Heck, how many domestic horses are there today vs before automobiles?

[someplaceguy]

> How many working horses are there today vs before automobiles?

Well, exactly. The less working horses there are, the more expensive and exclusive it would be to ride them.

There could be 1 trillion automobiles and I bet you, none of these automobiles would compare to riding a real, live horse.

Similarly, there could be 1 trillion AI robots, they could do everything better than a human, and yet I bet you'd still want to ride (or otherwise experience) a real, live human.

My point is that if automobiles were always better than horses in every way, then nobody would want horses. But even today, with the amazing automobiles that we have, some of which even faster and more reliable than most horses, it's clear that we still want horses.

My question is, if horses were as intelligent as us and they could have their basic needs met extremely cheaply, would they be willing to work at all, apart from the occasional ride? Because the horse labor pool would shrink immensely if they didn't really want to work.

[TerrifiedMouse]

> Well, exactly. The less working horses there are, the more expensive and exclusive it would be to ride them.

So you expect there to be less of us?

Imagine everyone who is selling labor today out of a job.

[someplaceguy]

> > Well, exactly. The less working horses there are, the more expensive and exclusive it would be to ride them.

> So you expect there to be less of us?

Less working people, not less people.

> Imagine everyone who is selling labor today out of a job.

If it's because they don't need it anymore, that's great!

[TerrifiedMouse]

> Less working people, not less people.

What are the people not work going to eat?

[fragmede]

If they get hungry enough, the working ones.