|
|
|
|
|
by wlst14
956 days ago
|
|
You might be right. Just open the document named "Informe de valoración de los criterios de adjudicación cuantificables mediante juicio de valor" in the link above. It is digitally signed by Juan José García Ripoll, an expert that should not have any conflict of interest. https://web.archive.org/web/20220521122845/http://quantic.bs...
(The website was removed)
So it was a collaborator. And the team leader was Artur Garcia. Oh! Wait! Artur is a co-founder:
https://www.qilimanjaro.tech/team/ What a plot twist hum! So they knew each other. And instead of doing this from a BSC salary they launched an spin-off and then sold their work to the BSC being part of BSC while he was working 50% of his time for BSC and therefore being a public employee and having an incompatibility. |
|
First of all, this tender only received one application. There could have been other applicants as it happened in Galicia's quantum computer tender, but there were none.
Second, this application was done by a collective of companies of which Qilimanjaro is only one more participant, responsible for calibration and integration.
Third, my role as scientist in this evaluation was only to certify that the specifications of the tender proposal follow the scientific requirements of the call, and whether any parameter is below or above the requested standards. That is tickboxing essentially and with only one applicant this does not influence the outcome.
So I am asking you to retract these accusations as I am concerned, or follow suit if you have so much evidence of wrongdoing.