[penguin_booze]

You do you but, at the point of publishing a branch for review, I'd insist the changes are presented as a story, with well-written commit messages that helps the reader/reviewer orient themselves and presents a coherent narrative.

Anthing else, I call it a landfill site, not a maintained repository.

In fact, I'd go as far as using their commit habit as a measure of a candidate's consideration for their colleagues.