|
|
|
|
|
|
by anon84873628
960 days ago
|
|
|
One way that I've seen this explained (not that I necessarily agree with it or care to defend it) is that the city somehow has an obligation to _future_ residents. Or put another way, to a minimum level of sustainability as a going concern. Another commenter framed this as ensuring that essential service workers can afford to live in the area. |
|
|