[Aeolun]

> you haven't been exposed to many implementations using non-trivial concurrency

That is entirely accurate. I struggle to imagine scenarios in which I’d need two parallel routines to communicate with each other.

[_lvbh]

Maybe because we probably shouldn’t be doing that in JavaScript. I primarily use Go and work with Go routines often but I’ve never wanted to do anything remotely close to it in JavaScript. If I wanted proper concurrency, I would be using Go, not JS