[haakonhr]

Is it free though?

I'm a fan of rebase myself, but understand the point made above. For me, the biggest pro of a clean history is when doing `git blame`. If the history is clean and the commits are good, it might solve my issue. On the other hand, if the commit in question is a huge mess of unrelated things it doesn't help me at all. I also find it way easier to review a PR with a clean, well-described history.

[ajkjk]

Well I also object to multiple unrelated changes in the same commit. Those should be separate commits, and separate code reviews for that matter.