|
|
|
|
|
|
by pbronez
960 days ago
|
|
|
It's a messy world. The question is: to what extent does the CCP control the production and use of model? Yes, the license calls out that Taiwan is not part of China and attempts to limit that statement to this specific agreement. They have to call this out because CCP has a very different opinion on this than the rest of the world. Which definition will prevail if a dispute about model use comes to court in the Chinese legal system? Yes, people are trying to require ethical use of AI via licensing. This model is trying to enforce China's view of the world. It's important to understand what that view is, and consider if you want to commit yourself to it. More detail on the differing definitions of "terrorism" [0]: > The United States and China do have many reasons to cooperate in counterterrorism, but they also have different political systems and different values. The United States sees some Uighur and Tibetan movements as legitimate political and protest efforts that China sees as threats to its security. The United States sees Iran as an extremist nation and the leading sponsor of state terrorism while China sees it as a regime that it may be possible to deal with in pragmatic terms. [0] https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-and-chinese-cooperation-cou... |
|
|
> Which definition will prevail if a dispute about model use comes to court in the Chinese legal system?
The license specifies that the applicable laws are the laws of the PRC, and NOT the laws of Macau, Hong Kong, nor Taiwan.
And you're claiming the courts in PRC will just say: "no, because Taiwan is part of China, let's use the laws of Taiwan instead"?
I mean, I'm ashamed that I even replied to your comment.