[todd-davies]

I don't think it's correct to paint Khan as following a "big is bad" standard. For instance, in [1] she explicitly says the opposite:

> Antimonopoly does not mean ‘big is bad.' The New Brandeisians—like Justice Brandeis—recognise that certain industries tend naturally towards monopoly. This is especially true of networks. In such cases, the answer is not to break these firms up, but to design a system of public regulation that prevents the executives who manage this monopoly from exploiting their power. A second goal is to ensure that executives face the right incentives to provide the best service possible to everyone who relies on the monopoly to sell or to buy a particular product or service. In the past Americans have used both direct government regulation, and various forms of antimonopoly law and policy, to achieve these ends.

[1] https://academic.oup.com/jeclap/article/9/3/131/4915966

[astrange]

I would believe what she said if she was doing this, but instead she's suing tech companies and asking them to break up in silly ways which is… not that.