Wouldn't it be _more_ informative to see a "realworld" project, possibly built using LINQ, and the performance comparison done within the context of that project?
If what you want to measure is LINQ performance, sure, but in the context of measuring the language fundamental like class versus struct, it is an unnecessary overhead.
The article itself says it:
> However, the main reason why the benchmarks are not correct is because of LINQ and lazy evaluation.
The article itself says it:
> However, the main reason why the benchmarks are not correct is because of LINQ and lazy evaluation.