Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wrp 965 days ago
What is more of an issue here, the possibly representative reactions of a few students and teachers, or the whole process by which school readings are chosen? As a high school student, I really hated A Separate Peace and Lord of the Flies. I wondered, with all the great literature written just in the past century, why were we forced to read such downers? Why couldn't they choose novels that made more students enjoy reading? If you would ask me what I'd recommend instead, off the top of my head, I'd suggest anything by John Steinbeck, for example.
3 comments

This might be a case where AI in teaching and easy availability of electronic texts might actually help the humanities.

Grade the reading level of 1000s of texts, allow students to choose from among any of those thousands of texts that are age and grade-appropriate, and have AI develop custom course materials for that book and support the teacher’s grading process. No teacher, or even school system, has the resources to develop materials for every possible good book, nor necessarily to be able to grade the relevant homework (at least at HS level). AI could.

The teacher role would include review and adjustment of a student’s chosen syllabus for breadth and depth. (“Not everything has to be written by Brontë, Amy.”) Students might carry that positive experience of reading what they choose into adulthood and actually read for pleasure as an adult. (Isn’t that the desired outcome?)

If given the choice in school, I would have skipped novels altogether (except SF and fantasy) and read poetry anthologies and non-fiction (travel literature, religious literature, collections of popular essays, histories, Great Books, etc.) instead. The reading assignments of “sophisticated” (i.e. depressing, neurotic, middlebrow, often NYC-centric) modern novels led to me skipping the whole novel genre for leisure reading ever since, i.e. for 50+ years. Did I miss much?

Side note: I was assigned dozens of essays to write in K-12, and never once was assigned an actual essay to read. Students were assigned classic essays to read in 19th and early 20th Century schools, but not in my mid 20th Century public schools.

> ...never once was assigned an actual essay to read.

I recognize this as a huge problem in education and sometimes bore my colleagues with rants about it. In my field of work, we expect grad students to write a thesis/dissertation without ever having studied good examples of such.

I once asked a famous textbook author for examples of well-written dissertations in his field, so I could have students study them as models. After thinking on it, he said he couldn't come up with any, observing that students are generally poor writers. Well, I think we educators have to take some of the blame for that.

The problem with lord of the flies is that it is fiction and does not necessarily represent the way people will actually behave in that situation. We have the example of an actual shipwrecked boys and it did not turn out like the book at all:

* https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/may/09/the-real-lord-...

Two significant differences make that real life story totally different from Lord of the Flies.

(1) In that story the boys are friends who ran away from boarding school and stole a boat with the intention of catching fish and sailing to someplace that would be more fun than boarding school. IOW all of them were probably of fairly similar ages, disposition, and character type. And they they were the kind of kids who would think doing that was a good idea.

(2) In Lord of the Flies, the boys are a typical mixed bag of British boarding school boys including young ones, big ones, jocks, wimps, nerds....

Middle School anywhere is often a civilized version of Lord of the Flies, and any grade in a 1940s British boarding school was worse, as attested to by CS Lewis. So the outcome in each of those stories is totally consistent with reality.

I was a student at a fairly lenient military boarding school in 8th and 9th grade, and my experiences there confirm the veracity of how the Lord of the Flies ends.

It is part of the definition of any novel that it is fiction. LoF's understanding of anthropology has been shown up as flawed, that is quite true.
> Steinbeck

Like East of Eden with its uplifting themes like abusive childhoods, survivor guilt leading to suicide and abusive narcissism?

But I jest, there are uplifting moments and themes of redemption and the good in humanity. I'm inclined to agree that it'd be a much better choice than Lord of the Flies.