|
|
|
|
|
|
by charles_f
963 days ago
|
|
|
This one doesn't show, but this one does: https://youtu.be/K7f6uevARno?t=375 I'd put that more on following others who removed the shoes inside, including both the ex-wife and ex-husband. But that seems to have had an importance in the judgment, which talks about not wearing a robe and not wearing shoes, making it unusual. |
|
|