[runako]

I mean that still puts all the effort on the reader vs the interviewer. Part of the point of a good interview is it's not just a brain dump, it's a curated conversation that helps enlighten the listener.

> feel free to search for relevant parts

Part of the value of an interview done well is that it helps enlighten me about what I might find relevant. How would I possibly know what parts are relevant before listening, unless I were going in with an agenda or trying to research a specific item? He interviews really powerful people; searching through their thoughts seems like the worst possible way to consume this information.

A transcript like this might be useful for researchers, but will still have limited reach because few people have the luxury of being able to read a transcript of a 3-hour interview.