Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by neonsunset 962 days ago
Whether it ships with it or not is, however, irrelevant. As long as the library is sufficiently popular and accepted by community, it can be seen as the advantage of a particular platform/language.

In this regard, while it is nice that PLINQ and various `Parallel`-related APIs come out of box in C#, it is a marginal difference with Rust where building parallel loops is `cargo add rayon` away.
2 comments
samus 962 days ago
If it doesn't ship with the default distribution of the language, then there's the risk that multiple mutually incompatible libraries emerge or that the adoption by the ecosystem is spotty. Best example: the async runtime mess in the Rust ecosystem.
link
neonsunset 962 days ago
There is no async runtime mess. Tokio is the preferred one, and given Rust's goals it is difficult to do it better (pluggable async executors and the degree of flexibility such abstraction offers - running both on big servers and bare cooperative multi-tasking on microcontrollers).

In addition, multiple versions of transitive dependencies can coexist in Rust without conflicting with each other, there is no such risk.

link
samus 962 days ago
Quite so. But I am under the impression that not every library supports Tokio as a runtime. And while it might be possible to run multiple runtimes in the same process, or use compatibility wrappers, it sounds like trouble.
link
pjmlp 962 days ago
It is definitely a mess, given incompatible semantics making it an herculean effort to write runtime agnostic async libraries.
link
capableweb 962 days ago
> Whether it ships with it or not is, however, irrelevant

When talking about projects in the wild, sure. But if we're specifically talking about language features, then "something being a part of the language" is wildly different than "installable 3rd party library".

link
neonsunset 962 days ago
This mentality is the exact cause behind both .NET and JVM worlds being worse at enjoying the OSS-first benefits of their ecosystems than Rust or, God forbid, Go where it is expected to import a widely known good packages for solving a particular task.

Sometimes, it is a scar tissue from dealing with NIH syndrome too - at least you can use the OOB tools for combating with it, but the NIH itself it the actual source of people being resistant to adopting proven and good solutions developed by community.

link
pjmlp 962 days ago
On the contrary, it means I can be sure wherever there is an implementation the features I depend on are available out of the box, and don't depend on someone during late nights to add support for the given platform.

It also means that I don't need to download the whole Internet for basic features.

link
javanonymous 961 days ago
I'm not sure if I understand your point, but I haven't seen any NIH at the places where I have worked. We have been encouraged to use popular stable libraries when possible.

Java has several 3rd party dependencies that are expected to just be there in projects where I have worked. Examples are Lombok, Apache Commons and SLF4J. These have become so widely used, that I have stopped thinking about them as external dependencies.

Guava used to be more popular too, but now that Java has Optional and Streams, I don't see it as often.

link