I was hoping there is some interesting concept behind your comment. It’s not quite obvious in which sense exactly you would be seeing a human as an explosion.
The word choice of "explosion" is only mildly interesting IMO, and only because it emphasizes that trees and people can be (often more accurately) thought of as events instead of as things.
For me, the more interesting / relevant part (and the reason I brought it up in the first place) is the "interface" aspect.
I, likewise, hope there's "some interesting concept" behind your comments too. I can only presume you'll offer a highly stimulating intellectual payoff for answering your highly tedious questions. :-D
For me, the more interesting / relevant part (and the reason I brought it up in the first place) is the "interface" aspect.
I, likewise, hope there's "some interesting concept" behind your comments too. I can only presume you'll offer a highly stimulating intellectual payoff for answering your highly tedious questions. :-D