| The 5 hours doesn’t surprise me. I was on the jury of a federal fraud trial with 2 defendants with 15 charges, ~30 million in losses. We were thorough and went through each count separately, including reviewing some of the evidence, and were done in maybe 8 hours spread across 2 days. We ended up with a mixed verdict: one count not guilty for both, another not guilty for one. I fully believe they were aware and committed fraud for the not guilty counts, but the prosecutor wasn’t able to cross the “reasonable doubt” threshold in our minds for those specific instances. Only thing we weren’t super careful about was the first requirement for Mail/Wire fraud, which is “Mail and wires” were used. It was amusing that the prosecutors brought in a bank IT guy to explain that “the internet uses wires”, but not really something we questioned. |
I wonder if they did that to avoid having to explain to the jury that wire fraud does not actually require the use of wires...