Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pdonis 963 days ago
> Big companies are easier to regulate.

But the problem isn't regulating the big companies, or the smaller companies, or underground entities. The problem is state-level adversaries like China who might misuse a technology, whether it's AI or anything else. Such adversaries can't be regulated by laws or executive orders or UN declarations; they have proven that many times in the past. The only way to control them is to have sufficient counter-capability against whatever assets they have. And government regulation is a terrible way to try to achieve that goal.
2 comments
skybrian 963 days ago
State-level actors are one problem. People defrauding the elderly are a different problem. Ransomware is a third problem. They are all problems.

The idea that there's only one important problem is a fallacy.

link
pdonis 963 days ago
> The idea that there's only one important problem is a fallacy.

I have made no such claim.

The people advocating for regulating AI are claiming it will solve all the relevant problems--i.e., that it will prevent AI from doing great harm. So pointing out a problem that the regulations will not solve is refuting the claims the advocates of regulation are making. That was my point.

link
skybrian 963 days ago
That's surprising and seems like an overreach. Whatever those advocates claimed, it doesn't seem very relevant to deciding with or not a particular regulation is a good idea.
link
pdonis 962 days ago
> Whatever those advocates claimed, it doesn't seem very relevant to deciding with or not a particular regulation is a good idea.

I don't see why not. The whole point of regulations is to regulate, i.e., to keep the regulated activity within some particular bounds. If the regulation won't accomplish that, then it is pointless. Unless, of course, the actual purpose of the regulation is not the same as the purpose that is publicly stated--which is exactly what happens with regulatory capture.

link
smokel 963 days ago
One could also try to be friendly towards strangers, and not have them be their adversaries in the first place.
link
pdonis 963 days ago
> One could also try to be friendly towards strangers, and not have them be their adversaries in the first place.

We have tried this with China, going back to Nixon opening up trade relations in the early 1970s. It hasn't helped.

link