|
|
|
|
|
by ckdarby
964 days ago
|
|
I get where this comment is coming from, but isn't it much more complicated? They're cashflow breakeven and could run net income negative over the next five years as a subscription market grab with the capex amortization over the 5 years. It is possible they could become incredibly profitable when the capex investment in 5 years is much less than the initial capex. Equipment costed $5 or $1/yr. Replacement equipment could cost $2.50 or $0.50/yr. I see this plenty with business capex for on-prem/datacenters. What costed $5M over 5 years on a refresh replacement for 1:1 replacement is usually more than half the cost. |
|