|
|
|
|
|
by esoterae
967 days ago
|
|
The way in which the author structured the language used to describe things may be the most confusing thing of all. For example: "HEAD^ and HEAD~ are the same thing (1 commit ago)" Followed by: "But I guess they also wanted a way to refer to “3 commits ago”, so HEAD^3 is the third parent of the current commit, and HEAD~3 is the parent’s parent’s parent." The author's language implies a contradiction they immediately prior said doesn't exist. If these two distinct constructs were indeed different ways to define the same relationship, the second paragraph would say "^3 and ~3 are both ways of saying the third parent of the current commit, or the parent's parent's parent." Instead, they've defined the constructs as different once again. |
|
They're not the same thing. Merge commits can have multiple parents, and HEAD^3 refers to the third parent. If HEAD is not a merge commit, then HEAD^3 doesn't refer to anything. HEAD~3, by contrast, refers to following the parent's parent's parent, independent of how many parents any of the commits in question had.