[tianzhou]

One of Bytebase authors here. I learned Dolt a while back (memorable name).

I think Dolt is closer to Neon/Xata. But still there are differences.

IIUC, Dolt is bringing the database feature to Git, while Neon/Xata is bringing the Git feature to database.

Speaking of Bytebase, if Dolt is really good at versioning schema migration, Bytebase value proposition will be a bit less attractive, but not much. It's similar to the Git story, regardless how powerful Git is, people still need GitLab/GitHub for the developer workflow on top of the mere versioning.

[Hydrocharged]

I just learned of Neon a few weeks ago. From the looks of it, Neon supports branching, but it doesn't support merging. Xata supports both branching and merging, however it only applies to the schema.

Dolt (and eventually DoltgreSQL) handles everything. Branching, merging, diffing, cherry-picking, commits, and more. Working with both the schema and data. On top of that, we also have DoltHub (https://www.dolthub.com/) that's analogous to GitHub, and DoltLab (https://www.dolthub.com/#doltlab) that's analogous to GitLab. We are targeting the entire ecosystem from the bottom up.