|
|
|
|
|
by chacha102
961 days ago
|
|
I agree - they are exercising the principle of opportunity cost. While most parents probably would make more than the $700 / month, the value might simply not be worth it. I remember a study that concluded that in reality, there is a cap on how much additional money improves your day-to-day life. And if a family is already past that on one income, why do you need two? |
|
That cant be right. I am in a LCOL area and its almost double that for 1 kid. And its one of the cheapest options.
It says the average is 700 per household. Perhaps it counts households without kids?