|
|
|
|
|
by TeMPOraL
967 days ago
|
|
I'm sorry for misunderstanding your earlier comment, and thank you for clarifying. I can see how this is a much more serious problem. However. That sounds to me less like an IDE problem, and more like a Linux problem. Specifically, the problem with the... unique way a typical Linux system handles OOM state, i.e. by suddenly curling into a ball and becoming completely unresponsive until you power-cycle it. I've hit that a couple times in the past, and my solutions were, in order: - Monitoring the memory usage and killing the offending process (a graph database runtime) before it OOMs the system; - After becoming tired of the constant vigilance, quadrupling the amount of RAM available in the OS; (yes, this is why people overprovision their machines relative to what naive economists or operations people may think..) - Changing the job, and switching to working on Windows; WSL may not be 100% like a real Linux, but it inherits sane OOM handling from its host platform. I'm sure there is a way in Linux to set a memory quota for the offending IDE process. This would hopefully reduce your problem to the more benign (if annoying) case I described earlier. |
|
While I agree that Linux sucks at handling this particular situation, my point was about Rust's complexity. Normally, when you're using C/++ dependencies the IDE doesn't need to inspect the internals of the libraries to figure out how to parse dependent code. And, it's also true that rust-analyze doesn't know how to stop trying. It will parse what you give it, even if it kills your machine.