|
|
|
|
|
by JAlexoid
966 days ago
|
|
> "99% of videos on youtube", not "99% of videos I watch". And in the context, this is even less sensible. 99% of content on Netflix is what "you" don't watch. So there's literally no difference on that point for YT and Netflix. > The issue is that even paying for YouTube isn't enough to not see any ads on YouTube. Native ads are skippable and are already providing revenue for the creator - skipping them doesn't affect creator's income. Ad-block screws over the creators. There's a difference... > YouTube merely provides the logistical support. Have you ever worked at a production company? Because providing legal, logistical and marketing support is also what production companies do - that is what YouTube provides to creators. If you apply the same logic, then Universal Media Group isn't a production company - because they also primarily provide those functions. Not to mention that YouTube has produced, may even still produce, original content. |
|
"I don't watch this" and "I would never watch this under any circumstance" are different.
>Have you ever worked at a production company? Because providing legal, logistical and marketing support is also what production companies do - that is what YouTube provides to creators. If you apply the same logic, then Universal Media Group isn't a production company - because they also primarily provide those functions.
What you're saying is that production companies provide logistics, and YouTube provides logistics, therefore YouTube is a production company. Socrates is a man, and I am a man, therefore I am Socrates.
>Not to mention that YouTube has produced, may even still produce, original content.
Sure. But the vast majority of the content that drives traffic to YouTube is not produced by them.