| No hate, I simply can understand why paying for youtube feels different from paying for netflix. These are not some bulletprof arguments why nobody should pay money, it's just why I personally can feel it's different than paid content provider/producer. >You're basically restricted to the tastes of Netflix's buyers. Same as going to the cinema. I don't expect to see 5 minutes of figuring out camera settings and 2 hours of black screen. I completely miss how it's not a feature. At the same time I support variety and experiments with a content of any kind, it's just not that. >You can easily skip these, not sure what the issue is here. No issue. I use sponsorblock as I mentioned, so no manual intervention required. Why do I have to do it though. >all change their inventory frequently due to licensing. It wasn't long ago that you could watch Sopranos on Amazon. Did you know they announced removal of Sopranos beforehand? You could make an informed decision given a warning. >it's a problem with the US legal system. No it's not. But thank you for a perfect counter. >YouTube has created tons of wealth for creators and has cut out tons of the usual Hollywood intermediaries. Fair enough, there is some service being provided by youtube. They basically made all the content on platform possible. >Additionally, there has never been a greater investment made on storing and distributing video like the one Google made on YouTube. This wasn't a charity. |
And if someone uses false rationalizations to use ad-blockers, while claiming to support the content creators - I can only sense hypocrisy and entitlement.