Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fidrelity 969 days ago
I just can't get my head around this argument of 'scales to zero'.

If you have one or more professional developers working on a project how can you be bothered about an extra $20-$200/month when you know you'll also be spending a couple of engineering hours (worth more than $200) on migrating later?

2 comments

I feel exactly the same way - this idea of a lambda monolith seems applicable to hobby projects only.
Scales to zero means you can span as many environments as you want and don’t bother. Every dev can have multiple environments to demo features and do experiments.
Isn’t that what local machines are for?

If you’re in territory where running locally isn’t feasible you’ve either done something horribly wrong or have scaled way past the point where either a single lambda or single ec2 instance is sufficient.

I don't see how I can use a local machine to demo a feature to my PM.