It's clearly not required. The site would function without it. Therefore an activist will eventually argue to a court that it's a GDPR violation and win, meaning you have to pay up a fraction of your revenue (possibly sending you under).
GDPR threads on HN are always like this. Tons of people saying "no no it doesn't work that way it wouldn't be reasonable" and then when that thing ends up being ruled illegal, "of course it's illegal everyone knew that it's all very clear".
GDPR is written in such a way that you can't ever know what is or isn't allowed.
GDPR threads on HN are always like this. Tons of people saying "no no it doesn't work that way it wouldn't be reasonable" and then when that thing ends up being ruled illegal, "of course it's illegal everyone knew that it's all very clear".
GDPR is written in such a way that you can't ever know what is or isn't allowed.