[whynotminot]

I think their assumption is that if you’re the kind of pro that needs that many monitors, you’ll upgrade to the better chips they sell.

But it’s a frustrating limitation and remains one of the only areas their old intel based laptops were better at.

[d3w4s9]

For the past 3 years, including with the latest laptops, "better chip" means 14" M* Pro starting at $1,999. $1,299 M1/M2 or $1,599 Macbook Pro does not support that. When you can find support for dual external display on $600 Windows laptops, or Intel Macbooks since at least 2012. By any standard this is an embarrassment and a regression.

[kjkjadksj]

Having 2 monitors isn’t even that ‘pro’ these days. I see receptionists with three sometimes.

[KeplerBoy]

An assumption they are so unsure about, that they kind of force that decision on their users.