[nevinera]

Well, partly that was a mistaken impression because I thought that your comment was also from vrosas. But I think there's enough in there to assess your attitude toward code-review at least a _bit_:

> They have 12 people and no customers, they can almost certainly adopt a very aggressive developer cycle that optimizes almost exclusively for happy-path velocity. You'd never do that at 50+ engineers with customers but for 12 engineers who have no customers? It's fine, in fact it's ideal.

12 engineers churning out code with no code-review at all? That'll produce velocity, for sure. It'll also produce not just an unmaintainable mess, but an interesting experiment, in which you get to find out which of your engineers are socially capable enough to initiate technical communication independently and construct technical rapport _without_ that process helping them to do so. Hope none of them hold strong technical opinions that clash!

[insanitybit]

Who said "no code-review at all"? Not me, not vrosas as far as I saw.