[sime2009]

Look at it this way, why should a project like IM pay MicroSoft for the privilege of enriching and adding value to the Windows platform?

[layer8]

The fee for code signing certificates doesn't go to Microsoft.

[sime2009]

Who actually receives the money is not relevant to my core point.

[kenjackson]

If it’s not relevant to your point, can you make your point without stating something that is false?

[sime2009]

"Look at it this way, why should a project like IM pay anyone for the privilege of enriching and adding value to the Windows platform?"

[kenjackson]

They aren’t adding value to the Windows platform, unless you consider any application is adding value to the platform it is running on. In which case why should one pay for dev tools, their dev computer, libraries, art assets, etc…

[rat9988]

Because Ms hasn't asked for it.

[sime2009]

Of course MS asked for it. They created and sustain this situation where software needs to signed for it to easily run on the Windows platform. Who do you think put the signature checking code and root keys in Windows?? The code signing gnomes?? fairies??

[justinclift]

Seems more like the work of gremlins or devils. ;)

[rat9988]

They didn't ask for ImageMagick. Would they have asked ImageMagick to develop the software for their platform to enrich it, I would have agreed that they should pay. Otherwise anyone can say I enrich your ecosystem so pay me.