[1letterunixname]

You appear to be leaping to the wrong conclusion. The problem is Canonical charging money for security updates. CentOS, Alma, Rocky, Fedora, Debian, openSUSE, Arch, and 300+ other Linux distros don't charge money for security updates either. The moral of the story is "Don't use enshitifying corporate Linux distros run by crazy people."

[r4indeer]

This still has nothing to do with the ImageMagick developers, which the original comment implies: "Compare [sic] to codesign, vulnerability management is more concerning."

You are free to criticize Canonical for their business model, but that seems off-topic to me right now.

[tremon]

The problem of Canonical charging money for security updates is off-topic when we're discussing ImageMagick's code-signing troubles on Windows.

[1letterunixname]

That's your opinion, and I don't care for your attempts to shut people down. Kindly control people on the rest of the internet. :peace: