|
|
|
|
|
by anon_cow1111
971 days ago
|
|
I need to ask this question for any chemical engineers currently reading this. I'm seeing people in the comments talking about how this could be applied to consumer vehicles, not just industry like cargo ships and agriculture. If I, the consumer, had unlimited access to cheap, unregulated liquid ammonia (as common as gasoline), how many precursor-steps am I away from having access to like... a LOT of high explosives? -asking for your friendly neighborhood crazy person with a vendetta against... whoever. As far as I can see, it's a very similar problem to hydrogen. It doesn't matter how safe you can make it, it matters how dangerous a random nutjob can make it. |
|
This always bothers me. People freak out about LiIon battery failures, or hydrogen, or ammonia, or nuclear power. But here we are with an entire economy riding on an explosive, firey, dirty fuel that is already causing global climate problems.
Safety concerns should be kept on-par with what we have today. Let’s not throw out a good solution because it can be dangerous in some cases. Any high-energy-dense thing we switch to after fossil fuels is going to release that energy if handled improperly. That concern should be quite low on the list.