| puts on my dipshit hat From a software perspective, I want people to normalize open bootloaders again. The iPad is really capable hardware held back by an overly opinionated OS that feels like a toll-booth on a treadmill. I want to love iOS, but iOS loves to hate me... even booting into a Termux instance on Linux would be preferable to me. I know that's a passe opinion though, so I'll add some other complaints. Hardware-wise, I think Apple should take a few cues from the Surface Pro. The kickstand on that really emphasizes it as a laptop alternative, and user-replaceable storage was a respectful addition that earned the "Pro" moniker. I think the iPad is capable of reprising both features, even if only for the Pro models. As-is, the current iPad Pro features feel more like enthusiast upgrades rather than professional tools. That's not bad, but they could do better. I'll be the first to admit that I far prefer the iPhone 4-style boxy design of the newer iPads. It's so much better than the rounded space-age models in a lot of ways. The only tweak I'd make in that department is a return to flush camera modules (even if it means lower-quality cameras). As a former iPad owner, I can count the number of photos I took on one hand. I can count the number of times the iPad didn't lay flat in the thousands. So honestly, I think most of the iPad's problems are in software right now. While we're dreaming, it would be nice to see a more repairable/accessible design that emphasizes repairing/replacing the front glass panel. It's a very expensive repair, and third-party covers are already quite popular in the aftermarket. |
Of course, my question is more hardware wise in that it looks to see if there is any major hardware "features" that would improve the device or for the most part, was the hardware mostly "perfect" in it's initial design (yes, no camera bump, etc would be nice).