This guy is a science journalist, the authors of the source research paper are more relevant if you're trying to infer anything about the material from the authors: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06668-3
FWIW I think even the original paper is more of a master class in riding an academic bubble than anything of important substance. I'm just not sure what looking at other articles by this journalist is supposed to convey.
FWIW I think even the original paper is more of a master class in riding an academic bubble than anything of important substance. I'm just not sure what looking at other articles by this journalist is supposed to convey.