[rprenger]

I kind of hoped the long term result of htmx, instead of just being a Javascript library, was to become a standard in a newer version of HTML itself. The constraints of only forms being able to do POSTs, and the only way to handle the response is to rewrite the entire page seems arbitrarily limiting. If htmx were just HTML6 or whatever, it'd outlive all the Javascript frameworks.

[GenerocUsername]

I think this is still possible.

It took a decade for JQuery to be nearly completely absorbed by browser standards.

[candiddevmike]

For the most part, jQuery was absorbed into ES/JavaScript, not HTML.

[jitl]

The most visible part of jQuery for me was always querying selectors - $('.some > a.selector'); and that certainly was something integrated into HTML/the DOM as document.querySelectorAll('.some > a.selector').

[nkozyra]

Well yeah, that's still under "browser standards."

[weo3dev]

The difference is that the internet can exist (and did) quite well without JavaScript. Without HTML there is no internet. Furthermore, ECMAScript is a language and W3C/WHATWG are a consortium that maintain HTML.

[Gud]

Sorry to nitpick, but there is a lot more to the internet than the web.

[troupo]

And the browser APIs still have significantly worse ergonomics than jQuery

[candiddevmike]

You'd have to merge JavaScript and HTML to get htmx in any usage capacity. HTML is not a programming language, it's a markup language.

[recursivedoubts]

I have thrown together a minimalist extension to HTML that I think captures the core ideas of htmx, although you are right that there are still some outstanding issues that probably need additional thinking to make it widely useful:

https://gist.github.com/1cg/d1ad1ddd5f43a8a993cd9f711135edc9

Here is an example button using these proposed extensions to HTML

  <button href="/example"
        method="patch"
        target="#divToReplace"
        onClick="this.submit()">
    This is an example button hypermedia control
  </button>

[flir]

I'd vote for being able to put an href attribute on any element (eg <div href=""> and <span href="">), and maybe binning <a> entirely. That seems like such an obvious enhancement to me, I figure there's probably a deep reason it hasn't been done.

[chiefalchemist]

Not sure of why it was done then, but currently for accessibility a link says, "This takes you to another page / URL" while a button says, "This performs some action / triggers some event."

If everything and anything is clickable, how does technology that supports accessibility handle that? Note: This isn't a way-a-figure-you-fool question. Not at all. It's a sincere question in the sense that accessibility matters, we can't forget that. So if we change, how can we be certain accessibility isn't left behind?

[flir]

Yeah, I wondered if it was accessibility, or maybe a limitation to support text browsers.

To take the opposite view, there's not much we can't wrap in an <a> since HTML5 (eg <a href=""><div></div></a> is valid, and makes the div clickable). How do accessible browsers support that today?

[candiddevmike]

So you want to inline JavaScript, similar to CSS and the `style` attribute?

[recursivedoubts]

I would prefer something more like what htmx has in hx-trigger:

https://htmx.org/attributes/hx-trigger/

w/ an explicit and declarative syntax, but that attribute is fairly involved

this was a brief exercise in thinking about the minimal changes necessary to HTML to support something like htmx, and unfortunately there isn't any attribute that maps to hx-trigger in the same way there is for other htmx attributes, so I resorted to the on* attributes + generalizing the submit() function on forms.

[Spivak]

Yes and no. You wouldn't call a <form> inlining JS while it does come with some degree of interaction. It would be an expansion of HTML to include a few new things to (ideally) enable a wider rage of lightly-interactive websites to be HTML only.

[mjburgess]

according to the people who write standards, but not the people who write browsers

[buildbot]

I literally just started with htmx, but can’t you override both of those behaviors? hx-<http verb> on the form will switch the verb it uses, and you can swap outerhtml, innerhtml, or some other css target?

Or am I incorrect?

[fwip]

I think you've slightly misread - they specified only forms can do POSTs, not that forms can do only POSTs. (Also, they're talking about vanilla HTML, not HTMX).

[buildbot]

Oh I did not catch that … oops

[meiraleal]

> The constraints of only forms being able to do POSTs

HTML elements shouldn't do POSTs, that's why JavaScript exists. <form> and <a> are elements that do HTTP requests but the same can be added to any other html or custom element. html integration with JS doesn't need another layer.