| You searching arxiv.org stood out to me. I wish I had better skills at searching academic papers for problems I'm trying to solve or that I'm just thinking about. I think just as there are some people that google better than others, I imagine a similar skill applies to academic papers. Anyone encounter this? How do I get better at it? I thought at first it was an accessibility problem, and perhaps it still is. In that, I didn't have access to a library of academic papers. But, arxiv.org does make available a lot of content for free. The content seems to be growing too. Another question I'm exploring is how do I decide which journals to subscribe to. I have a limited budget so have to pick wisely. What makes things difficult is that the papers that I have found interesting in the past, seemingly in a related field, are still published to various journals. One more random comment. I really can't wait until LLMs are applied towards academic papers. Academic papers build on-top of each other and there are concepts that are considered "common knowledge" to experts and may require a long history of papers to consume to build a foundation of concepts and vocabulary. The difficulty is that recursively these papers introduce the same problem. A lot of times the concepts are not that difficult and it would be wonderful if an LLM could be used to fill the gaps as if I were talking to a expert. I guess there are sort of expository papers that act as a checkpoint for a particular topic. I'm not sure how to find these. |
In fact, there are identical problems that are solved by different communities and you would not know because they use completely different lingo. Math optimization/dynamic programming/reinforcement learning is one of these.
Many of the accomplished scientists just read papers from other domains and adapt them to their own domain making huge progress.
So yes I see tremendous value to what you describe. A Google translate for academic work that can translate between domain specific lingos and common language.