[mrangle]

"High" is a relative measure.

"Output" is vague and not an agreed upon ultimate goal. Slave colonies have lots of "output".

"Everything becomes more expensive" is vague and unsupported enough to be noise.

"Immigrants create prosperity" is dime store propaganda and noise. It isn't necessarily true nor false. Your presentation of it is negatively persuasive, howerever.

Your statement about "people who want to participate should have the right even if it hurts others" is simply a zero borders argument to permanently bottom out most wages. It isn't a pro technology argument. Couching its opposition as an anti-tech argument is bizarre mental gymnastics that isn't cogent.

"People are scared of change" is a generalized a bullying tactic meant to insult people in case none of your other arguments hit the mark.

Your argument that labor "competition" can't be limited by borders, lest society becomes uncompetitive and catastrophic, isn't born out by the evidence in any productive nation to include Germany. It's also a statement that is embarassed by your thesaurus abuse of alarmist adjectives. Which in turn belie any confidence that your arguments are persuasive.

[mrtksn]

I think, If you are looking for meaning you should stop picking words individually, claiming stuff about those words and analyse the whole text instead.