Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mnode 966 days ago
Good reasons to be cautious, but a game changer if it works. This is gene silencing rather than gene editing so in principle risks to humans and the wider environment are relatively low.
2 comments

Does this kind of behavior exist in nature? If not it’s pretty bold to claim what the systemic effects will be ahead of time
It does exist in nature and mechanisms of RNA interference are pretty well understood. The headline is actually incorrect here as the gene isn't altered, but instead the RNA product of the gene is suppressed.

The important thing for safety is that this works at the level of RNA rather than by modifying DNA (which is how things like CRISPR work). Actions at the RNA level are effectively reversible; once the interfering RNA degrades the effect will go away. On this basis you can predict that it's unlikely to have many deleterious long-term effects, although you should still do trials to check.

Yes, its done in most eukaryotes.
I heard this two years ago. I will stay far away from this.