I can only see that you are justifying the war crimes and atrocities by isreal against Palestinian civilians by just saying that anyone opposing whatever response isreal is doing (even war crimes) is a support to terrorism.
Your suggestion regarding avoiding binary thinking is a great idea, and in this complex conflict it is important to retain nuance. However, your comment above could itself be interpreted as an example of binary "with us or against us" thinking, which might be seen as escalatory or unhelpful if we wish to avoid bias and conflict.
In other words, it's important to incorporate diverse perspectives and not end up promoting the very thing you may be against.
In examining multiple ways Mr Cosgrove's comment could be interpreted, my perspective here is striving for a balanced viewpoint. Striving for a balanced viewpoint does not necessarily imply insensitivity or bias; rather, it's an effort to understand the complexities of this long-standing conflict.
In other words, it's important to incorporate diverse perspectives and not end up promoting the very thing you may be against.
In examining multiple ways Mr Cosgrove's comment could be interpreted, my perspective here is striving for a balanced viewpoint. Striving for a balanced viewpoint does not necessarily imply insensitivity or bias; rather, it's an effort to understand the complexities of this long-standing conflict.