Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mkup 965 days ago
There's one thing I can't understand in this story: if that's lawful interception, why Hetzner and Linode bothered to set up MitM interception with different LE certificate and key, rather than extract the TLS private key directly from the RAM and/or storage device of the VPS? Even if this is a physically dedicated server, they can extract the private key from the RAM by dumping the RAM contents after unscheduled reboot. Extraction of the private key isn't visible in CT logs, much more stealthier, practically undetectable.
3 comments

Because it was easier, most likely.

There's also a possibility that one would be a "search" and the other would be an "interception" with different levels of approvals requested, but I don't know what the current legal situation in Germany is right now.

Likely because it's 'more illegal'. I'd bet they are not allowed to hack into the server if it's not directly involved in the cybercriminal activity.
On a physical server, couldn't you just hotplug a PCIe card in there and DMA out any data you are interested in? Something like a network card with firmware specifically for the purpose should do it. It sounds so much a standard thing for law enforcement that I imagine such equipment should be available off the shelf?