[Our_Benefactors]

Dumb article full of dumb quotes from dumb people with politically correct job titles. If I was at midjourney I wouldn’t want to talk to them either because they are the worst type of agenda-driven journalist. Wow, minimal prompts have minimal amounts of variation between seeds! Now report on something interesting, like how prompting gore/violence/death tokens outputs fluffy pictures of cats and fields of flowers due to training methodology, and how this makes models perform worse even for “non censored” content.

Scammers, grifters, and charlatans, the lot of them who have never written a line of code and still want a piece of the pie to themselves. Fuck every “AI ethics think tank”, “AI policy expert”, and so on who wants to limit and remove people’s freedom of access to this technology.

[aydyn]

I agree with you, but these people are becoming more and more irrelevant by the minute.

Nobody is not using chatGPT or stable diffusion because it could be biased. The ship has already sailed and any complaints about bias (or copyright for that matter) are standing on the shore left behind.

[SenAnder]

> Nobody is not using chatGPT or stable diffusion because it could be biased.

But their makers did expend a lot of effort into lobotomizing, sorry, censoring, sorry, making the models "safe", due to the smears, sorry, "reporting" by these journalists.